Recent Articles from StockStory

Shares of aerospace and defense company AeroVironment (NASDAQ:AVAV) fell 8.5% in the afternoon session after the company announced a pair of proposed public offerings to raise capital. The unmanned aircraft maker intends to offer $750 million in common stock and an additional $600 million in convertible senior notes, which are a form of debt that can be converted into company shares. 

Shares of electric vehicle pioneer Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) fell 5.5% in the afternoon session after the company faced mounting concerns over its upcoming second-quarter delivery report and the potential impact of political tensions. Investors hit the brakes on Tesla ahead of its Q2 delivery numbers, with Wall Street analysts growing increasingly pessimistic. 

Check out the companies making headlines yesterday:

Industrial supplies company MSC Industrial Direct (NYSE:MSM) met Wall Street’s revenue expectations in Q2 CY2025, but sales were flat year on year at $971.1 million. Its non-GAAP profit of $1.08 per share was 5.1% above analysts’ consensus estimates.

Lattice Semiconductor’s first quarter results were met with negative market reaction as the company’s revenue and non-GAAP profit both came in line with Wall Street expectations but reflected a double-digit year-over-year decline. Management attributed the weaker sales environment to ongoing inventory digestion and macroeconomic uncertainty, particularly in the industrial and communications end markets. CEO Ford Tamer highlighted that while the company shipped below estimated true demand to help align with customer inventory levels, improvements were seen in bookings and certain segments such as communications, computing, and industrial, which returned to sequential growth after several quarters of stagnation.

Analog Devices' first quarter performance was marked by strong year-over-year revenue growth, with management attributing gains to broad-based demand across all end markets. CEO Vincent Roche emphasized that “revenue growth was broad-based with double-digit year-over-year growth across all end markets,” and highlighted particular strength in the automotive and industrial segments. However, management also noted that buying patterns were influenced by recent tariff announcements, leading to some order volatility and temporary pull-forward of demand, especially in the automotive sector. This dynamic contributed to a market reaction that was more cautious despite the company’s top- and bottom-line outperformance versus Wall Street expectations.

TopBuild’s first quarter saw sales decline as new residential construction remained soft, reflecting a challenging demand environment and continued caution among homebuyers. Management cited a slower-than-expected spring selling season, elevated interest rates, and economic uncertainty as key factors weighing on housing demand. CEO Robert Buck explained, “New residential construction demand remains soft with choppiness continuing across various geographies.” On the other hand, commercial and industrial activity provided a partial offset, particularly with momentum in data center construction and certain manufacturing subsectors. The market responded negatively to the results, given the persistent headwinds in the core residential segment and margin pressures compared to last year.

LiveRamp’s first quarter performance was met with a significant positive reaction from the market, reflecting investor optimism around the company’s results. Management credited the quarter’s momentum to ongoing strength in large customer renewals and the successful upsell of its data collaboration and Clean Room solutions. CEO Scott Howe highlighted a record quarter for contract renewals, including major financial services wins and expanded partnerships with top-tier clients. He also pointed to enhancements in the company’s platform—such as interface upgrades and backend modernization—as drivers of reduced churn and improved operational efficiency.

Entegris faced a difficult first quarter, as Wall Street reacted negatively to results that came in below expectations. Management pointed to two central challenges: a sharp contraction in capital equipment product sales—especially fluid handling and FOUPs (front-opening unified pods used in semiconductor fabs)—and growing uncertainty driven by new tariffs on U.S. exports to China. CEO Bertrand Loy noted that, “demand for these products is linked to new fab construction,” which has slowed notably in China, Japan, and Korea. He also highlighted the added pressure from U.S. export restrictions and unfavorable currency movements.

SmartRent’s first quarter saw a negative market reaction, reflecting cautious investor sentiment despite management’s efforts to reposition the business. Leadership pointed to an ongoing transition away from low-margin hardware sales towards a software-as-a-service (SaaS) model as a central factor behind the year-on-year revenue decline. Interim CEO John Dorman highlighted recent operational restructuring, noting, “Hardware implementation revenues have declined over the past year, our SaaS revenues grew by more than 17%.” Management also addressed the impact of non-cash charges and legal accruals, which contributed to wider losses.

Samsara’s first quarter results reflected continued demand from large enterprise customers and expanded adoption of its AI-powered safety and asset management solutions. However, the market responded negatively, with management attributing some deal delays to customer caution stemming from new tariffs on vehicles and equipment. CEO Sanjit Biswas pointed to increased focus on operational safety and preventive maintenance as key themes, while CFO Dominic Phillips noted that elongated sales cycles were widespread across industries due to macro uncertainty.

Rapid7’s first quarter results for 2025 were met with a negative market reaction, as softness in key product areas and a cautious customer environment weighed on investor sentiment. CEO Corey Thomas noted that while Detection and Response remained a core growth driver, the Risk and Exposure Management segment faced continued pressure, particularly among mid-market enterprise customers. Thomas attributed these challenges to extended deal cycles, tighter budgets, and customers reprioritizing spending, especially in sectors like healthcare and education. He remarked, “the environment is more dynamic and fluid than when we initially provided guidance,” underscoring the uncertainty surrounding purchasing behavior in the company’s core market segments.

HCI Group’s first quarter performance was met with a positive reaction from the market, driven by expanded operating margins and continued top-line growth. Management highlighted that the quarter benefited from a significant decline in the loss ratio, which was attributed to favorable weather and legislative changes that reduced claims volume. Chief Operating Officer Karin Coleman explained, “Gross earned premiums grew by 17% over the same quarter last year,” and noted the company’s ability to manage expenses. Chief Financial Officer Mark Harmsworth added that operational leverage, supported by the Exio technology platform, helped drive the combined ratio to 56%.

Verra Mobility’s first quarter results were met with a positive market reaction, reflecting performance ahead of Wall Street expectations on both revenue and adjusted earnings. Management attributed growth to broad-based strength across all three segments, with particular emphasis on increased product adoption and higher tolling activity in Commercial Services. CEO David Roberts noted that the company’s Government Solutions segment benefited from expansion in photo enforcement programs outside New York City and continued contract renewals, while the T2 Parking business saw incremental gains from its SaaS product offerings. Management also highlighted the company’s ability to generate higher free cash flow and maintain stable operating margins despite modest growth in travel volumes.

The Honest Company’s first quarter results came in ahead of Wall Street expectations, with top-line growth supported by strong demand for wipes and baby personal care products. However, the market responded negatively, reflecting investor concerns about a deceleration in key categories and shifting distribution dynamics. Management pointed to outperformance in natural product segments and highlighted that growth was especially strong outside of Target, where diaper sales faced headwinds due to retailer-specific changes and category pressure. CEO Carla Vernon emphasized, “Our wipes portfolio and our baby personal care collection were bright spots, benefiting from growing consumer interest in sensitive skin solutions.”

ICU Medical’s first-quarter results were met with a negative market reaction despite outperforming Wall Street’s revenue and profit expectations. Management attributed the quarter’s performance to strong growth across all business segments, highlighting accelerated demand in oncology and home infusion markets within consumables. CEO Vivek Jain acknowledged, “our consumables business grew in Q1 by 10% constant currency and 9% reported,” citing new global customer implementations and favorable pricing. However, management was transparent about one-off factors, such as the end of the IV Solutions shortage, and cautioned that the pace of growth may not persist into the next quarter.

CooperCompanies’ first quarter results reflected ongoing operational execution and product innovation, but the market responded negatively as concerns mounted over inventory headwinds and softening demand in key segments. CEO Al White pointed to strong organic revenue growth in daily silicone hydrogel lenses and surgical devices, but acknowledged that channel inventory reductions and tighter clinic spending, particularly in fertility, weighed on reported results. Management described the global operating environment as “more complex” and cited persistent pressures from both distributors and end customers managing inventory more conservatively.

Noodles & Company’s first quarter results were met with a negative market reaction, reflecting disappointment over profitability despite a modest uptick in sales. Management highlighted that the company’s comprehensive menu transformation, supported by intensified marketing and operational training, drove a meaningful rebound in same-store sales and guest traffic. CEO Andrew Madsen pointed to the introduction of new and reimagined dishes as a catalyst for heightened guest engagement, stating, “This sustained and significant improvement in our sales trends demonstrates to us that the execution of our previously announced strategic priorities have gained traction.” However, increased costs related to new product launches and one-time training expenses weighed on margins, leading to a larger adjusted loss than Wall Street anticipated.

United Parks & Resorts began 2025 with results that missed Wall Street’s expectations, as revenue fell short and adjusted profitability lagged consensus. Despite these challenges, the market responded positively, reflecting management’s explanations for the underperformance. Leadership identified the timing of Easter and spring break—shifting key attendance days into the next quarter—as the primary reason for lower admissions and per-guest spending in Q1. CEO Marc Swanson noted, “Despite the negative calendar shift, in-park per capita spending increased 1.1% during the first quarter to a record level and has now grown from 19 of the last 20 quarters.”

A surplus of cash can mean financial stability, but it can also indicate a reluctance (or inability) to invest in growth. Some of these companies also face challenges like stagnating revenue, declining market share, or limited scalability.

Generating cash is essential for any business, but not all cash-rich companies are great investments. Some produce plenty of cash but fail to allocate it effectively, leading to missed opportunities.

Rock-bottom prices don't always mean rock-bottom businesses. The stocks we're examining today have all touched their 52-week lows, creating a classic investor's dilemma: bargain opportunity or value trap?

Even if a company is profitable, it doesn’t always mean it’s a great investment. Some struggle to maintain growth, face looming threats, or fail to reinvest wisely, limiting their future potential.

Business services providers thrive by solving complex operational challenges for their clients, allowing them to focus on their secret sauce. But cutbacks in corporate spending and the threat of new AI products have kept sentiment in check, and over the past six months, the industry has tumbled by 1.1%. This drawdown was disheartening since the S&P 500 gained 5.7%.

Stability is great, but low-volatility stocks may struggle to deliver market-beating returns over time as they sometimes underperform during bull markets.

Companies that consistently increase their sales, margins, or returns on capital are usually rewarded with the best returns, and those that can do all three for years on end are almost always the legendary stocks that return 100 times your money.

Low-volatility stocks may offer stability, but that often comes at the cost of slower growth and the upside potential of more dynamic companies.

A company that generates cash isn’t automatically a winner. Some businesses stockpile cash but fail to reinvest wisely, limiting their ability to expand.

Wall Street’s bearish price targets for the stocks in this article signal serious concerns. Such forecasts are uncommon in an industry where maintaining cordial corporate relationships often trumps delivering the hard truth.

Wall Street has set ambitious price targets for the stocks in this article. While this suggests attractive upside potential, it’s important to remain skeptical because analysts face institutional pressures that can sometimes lead to overly optimistic forecasts.

Volatility cuts both ways - while it creates opportunities, it also increases risk, making sharp declines just as likely as big gains. This unpredictability can shake out even the most experienced investors.

A highly volatile stock can deliver big gains - or just as easily wipe out a portfolio if things go south. While some investors embrace risk, mistakes can be costly for those who aren’t prepared.

Hitting a new 52-week low can be a pivotal moment for any stock. These floors often mark either the beginning of a turnaround story or confirmation that a company faces serious headwinds.

Semiconductors are the core infrastructure powering the Information Age. The amount of data we ingest is also increasing exponentially, leading to elevated demand for chips with more processing power. This secular trend has buoyed the industry, which has posted a six-month return of 4.9%, almost identical to the S&P 500.

Even if a company is profitable, it doesn’t always mean it’s a great investment. Some struggle to maintain growth, face looming threats, or fail to reinvest wisely, limiting their future potential.

Volatility cuts both ways - while it creates opportunities, it also increases risk, making sharp declines just as likely as big gains. This unpredictability can shake out even the most experienced investors.

While some companies burn cash to fuel expansion, others struggle to turn spending into sustainable growth. A high cash burn rate without a strong balance sheet can leave investors exposed to significant downside.

Many investors pay attention to mid-cap stocks because they have established business models and expansive market opportunities. However, their paths to becoming $100 billion corporations are ripe with competition, ranging from giants with vast resources to agile upstarts eager to disrupt the status quo.

Rapid spending isn’t always a sign of progress. Some cash-burning businesses fail to convert investments into meaningful competitive advantages, leaving them vulnerable.

Market swings can be tough to stomach, and volatile stocks often experience exaggerated moves in both directions. While many thrive during risk-on environments, many also struggle to maintain investor confidence when the ride gets bumpy.

Stocks in the $10-50 range offer a sweet spot between affordability and stability as they’re typically more established than penny stocks. But their headline prices don’t guarantee quality, and investors should exercise caution as some have shaky business models.

The S&P 500 (^GSPC) is home to the biggest and most well-known companies in the market, making it a go-to index for investors seeking stability. But not all large-cap stocks are created equal - some are struggling with slowing growth, declining margins, or increased competition.

Mid-cap stocks have the best odds of scaling into $100 billion corporations thanks to their tested business models and large addressable markets. But the many opportunities in front of them attract significant competition, spanning from industry behemoths with seemingly infinite resources to small, nimble players with chips on their shoulders.

Investors looking for hidden gems should keep an eye on small-cap stocks because they’re frequently overlooked by Wall Street. Many opportunities exist in this part of the market, but it is also a high-risk, high-reward environment due to the lack of reliable analyst price targets.

Stocks in the $10-50 range offer a sweet spot between affordability and stability as they’re typically more established than penny stocks. But their headline prices don’t guarantee quality, and investors should exercise caution as some have shaky business models.

The Russell 2000 (^RUT) is home to many small-cap stocks, offering investors the chance to uncover hidden gems before the broader market catches on. However, these companies often come with higher volatility and risk, as their smaller size makes them more vulnerable to economic downturns.

The Russell 2000 (^RUT) is home to many small-cap stocks, offering investors the chance to uncover hidden gems before the broader market catches on. However, these companies often come with higher volatility and risk, as their smaller size makes them more vulnerable to economic downturns.

Over the past six months, Amkor’s stock price fell to $20.82. Shareholders have lost 19.9% of their capital, which is disappointing considering the S&P 500 has climbed by 5.7%. This may have investors wondering how to approach the situation.

SoundHound AI has gotten torched over the last six months - since January 2025, its stock price has dropped 46.7% to $10.75 per share. This was partly due to its softer quarterly results and might have investors contemplating their next move.

Over the last six months, Benchmark’s shares have sunk to $38.83, producing a disappointing 14.3% loss - a stark contrast to the S&P 500’s 5.7% gain. This was partly driven by its softer quarterly results and may have investors wondering how to approach the situation.

Over the past six months, Biogen’s stock price fell to $125.58. Shareholders have lost 16.3% of their capital, which is disappointing considering the S&P 500 has climbed by 5.7%. This might have investors contemplating their next move.

Over the past six months, United Parcel Service’s shares (currently trading at $100.82) have posted a disappointing 18.6% loss, well below the S&P 500’s 5.7% gain. This might have investors contemplating their next move.

Over the past six months, 3M has been a great trade, beating the S&P 500 by 11.4%. Its stock price has climbed to $151.90, representing a healthy 17.1% increase. This was partly due to its solid quarterly results, and the performance may have investors wondering how to approach the situation.

What a brutal six months it’s been for Norwegian Cruise Line. The stock has dropped 21.8% and now trades at $20.26, rattling many shareholders. This was partly due to its softer quarterly results and may have investors wondering how to approach the situation.

What a fantastic six months it’s been for Insteel. Shares of the company have skyrocketed 41.9%, hitting $37.21. This was partly thanks to its solid quarterly results, and the run-up might have investors contemplating their next move.

What a fantastic six months it’s been for Leonardo DRS. Shares of the company have skyrocketed 44.9%, setting a new 52-week high of $46.91. This was partly due to its solid quarterly results, and the performance may have investors wondering how to approach the situation.

Vimeo’s stock price has taken a beating over the past six months, shedding 38.2% of its value and falling to $4.01 per share. This might have investors contemplating their next move.

Shareholders of FormFactor would probably like to forget the past six months even happened. The stock dropped 22.6% and now trades at $34.21. This may have investors wondering how to approach the situation.

Ameresco has gotten torched over the last six months - since January 2025, its stock price has dropped 37.9% to $15.60 per share. This may have investors wondering how to approach the situation.

Synovus Financial has been treading water for the past six months, recording a small return of 1.8% while holding steady at $51.75.

Flywire has gotten torched over the last six months - since January 2025, its stock price has dropped 41.7% to $11.71 per share. This might have investors contemplating their next move.

As the craze of earnings season draws to a close, here’s a look back at some of the most exciting (and some less so) results from Q1. Today, we are looking at electronic components stocks, starting with Bel Fuse (NASDAQ:BELFA).

The end of the earnings season is always a good time to take a step back and see who shined (and who not so much). Let’s take a look at how health insurance providers stocks fared in Q1, starting with Cencora (NYSE:COR).

Quarterly earnings results are a good time to check in on a company’s progress, especially compared to its peers in the same sector. Today we are looking at Warner Music Group (NASDAQ:WMG) and the best and worst performers in the media industry.

Looking back on shelf-stable food stocks’ Q1 earnings, we examine this quarter’s best and worst performers, including Lamb Weston (NYSE:LW) and its peers.

As the Q1 earnings season wraps, let’s dig into this quarter’s best and worst performers in the renewable energy industry, including Generac (NYSE:GNRC) and its peers.

Earnings results often indicate what direction a company will take in the months ahead. With Q1 behind us, let’s have a look at Marcus & Millichap (NYSE:MMI) and its peers.

Let’s dig into the relative performance of Penguin Solutions (NASDAQ:PENG) and its peers as we unravel the now-completed Q1 processors and graphics chips earnings season.

Earnings results often indicate what direction a company will take in the months ahead. With Q1 behind us, let’s have a look at Salesforce (NYSE:CRM) and its peers.

Looking back on gas and liquid handling stocks’ Q1 earnings, we examine this quarter’s best and worst performers, including Chart (NYSE:GTLS) and its peers.

The end of an earnings season can be a great time to discover new stocks and assess how companies are handling the current business environment. Let’s take a look at how Boeing (NYSE:BA) and the rest of the aerospace stocks fared in Q1.

Quarterly earnings results are a good time to check in on a company’s progress, especially compared to its peers in the same sector. Today we are looking at Parsons (NYSE:PSN) and the best and worst performers in the defense contractors industry.

The end of the earnings season is always a good time to take a step back and see who shined (and who not so much). Let’s take a look at how real estate services stocks fared in Q1, starting with Compass (NYSE:COMP).

As the craze of earnings season draws to a close, here’s a look back at some of the most exciting (and some less so) results from Q1. Today, we are looking at professional staffing & hr solutions stocks, starting with Korn Ferry (NYSE:KFY).

The end of the earnings season is always a good time to take a step back and see who shined (and who not so much). Let’s take a look at how wireless, cable and satellite stocks fared in Q1, starting with Altice (NYSE:ATUS).