abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund Common Shares of Beneficial Interest (ASGI)

Competitors to abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund Common Shares of Beneficial Interest (ASGI)

American Tower Corporation 

American Tower Corporation provides an indirect competition to ASGI through its substantial investments in wireless communications infrastructure, which is crucial as mobile data demand increases. While American Tower’s focus is more on telecom assets, it attracts funds from investors looking for stable cash flow and dividends, similar to investors in infrastructure funds like ASGI. Although it operates in a niche market compared to ASGI's broader approach, its growth potential and specialization give it a competitive niche advantage.

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. 

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners competes with ASGI by offering a diversified portfolio of high-quality infrastructure assets across various sectors including utilities, transport, and energy. Brookfield has a strong track record of managing infrastructure investments and capitalizing on global opportunities, leveraging its extensive experience and resources to enhance returns for investors. The scale and breadth of Brookfield’s operations often provide it with lower capital costs and greater negotiation power, which gives it a competitive advantage.

Global Infrastructure Partners

Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP) primarily competes in the infrastructure investment space by focusing on large-scale investments in core infrastructure assets with stable cash flows. GIP's significant access to capital markets and deep industry expertise enable it to tackle larger projects and provide higher returns. Their focus on sustainability and technological innovation helps them mitigate risks and enhance the value of their assets, positioning them as a formidable competitor against ASGI.

Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation

Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation competes with ASGI by focusing on developing and operating a diverse range of infrastructure assets, including in the transportation, utilities, and energy sectors. Macquarie’s established reputation and operational expertise in North America offer it an edge in management efficiency and risk assessment. However, its dependence on the U.S. market can limit diversification compared to ASGI, which could be seen as a disadvantage.

NiSource Inc. 

NiSource presents competition to ASGI through its operations in utility infrastructure, focusing on delivering electricity and natural gas. NiSource has a regulated business model that ensures stable income through rate adjustments, which appeals to income-seeking investors. However, unlike ASGI, which seeks to offer diversified infrastructure exposure, NiSource's focus is primarily regional infrastructure assets, which may be viewed as a limitation compared to ASGI's wider investment strategy.